September 24th, 2008 |
Because my laptop doesn’t have a working screen at the moment (thank goodness for my second monitor), I’m researching repair versus purchase. I have looked at *a lot* of computers in the last week.
I’ve had the impression, thanks mostly to Dell’s barrage of emails, that laptops are getting cheaper and cheaper. Now that I’ve done the research, I can spot the scam.
The stores (online or offline) are filled with computer deals - mostly laptops in the $500 range. But now I know I could never get one that cheap. What do you get for $500?
- 1 gig of RAM, when Windows requires 2.
- 1 year of service, when you need a minimum of 2 (I’d recommend 3).
- No so-called “productivity suite” when most of us still need a word processor and a spreadsheet program.
I also can’t imagine getting a new laptop in 2008 without putting in it an extra $50 for the best wifi card available, and I wouldn’t buy one with less than 100 gigs of harddrive space. And then there’s the “Vista” issue: do you really want that junk on a computer you rely on?
When it’s all said and done, I can’t see buying a computer today for less than about $1100.
So I’m wondering which corners can be cut. For $150-$250, do I really need M$ Word and Excel when I can get pretty much the same thing for absolutely nothing? Are there really any benefits of paying for the same thing? What do you get for your $?
Tags:
computer,
M$,
question,
tech